Downsized US force in Afghanistan would still pack ‘lethal punch’: Trump ally

KABUL: The US military can slash its troop presence in Afghanistan and still pack a "lethal punch," an influential American lawmaker and close confidant to President Donald Trump said on Monday (Dec 16).

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham also said it would be "insane" for the US to trust the Taliban to keep Al-Qaeda and other jihadists in check, attacking a cornerstone of a prospective deal between Washington and the Taliban.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Graham's remarks came a day after US media reported that the Trump administration could announce plans as early this week to withdraw around 4,000 troops from Afghanistan.

The drawdown would mean about 8,600 US troops remained in Afghanistan, down from the current total of between 12-13,000.

Graham suggested the official announcement might not be as imminent as was suggested in the American press.

"If President Trump decides in the next few weeks to reduce our forces below the 12,000 we have, I could support that," Graham told reporters in Kabul.

Advertisement

Advertisement

"With 8,600 American forces aligned in the right configuration, we would have a very lethal punch".

Addressing the on-again, off-again negotiations between the US and the Taliban that have been taking place in Doha this year, Graham took issue with a central component of an eventual deal, which centres on the US withdrawing forces in return for a Taliban promise to fight Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group.

"The Taliban may not be trusted to be a reliable counterterrorism force," Graham said.

"The idea that any agreement would count on the Taliban to police, be the counterterrorism force to the American homeland, is a nonstarter."

Graham is thought to have been key in persuading Trump in September to drop the deal with the Taliban, even though the US and the insurgents had all but signed off on it.

In order to get talks back on track, the Taliban in recent weeks have reduced violence in Kabul.

But Graham suggested the insurgents were still not to be trusted, referencing a Read More – Source